4.6 Article

High epidemic burden of RSV disease coinciding with genetic alterations causing amino acid substitutions in the RSV G-protein during the 2016/2017 season in The Netherlands

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY
卷 112, 期 -, 页码 20-26

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2019.01.007

关键词

RSV; Genetics; Mutations; G-glycoprotein

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: We found amino acid substitutions in the Gglycoprotein of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) A during the 2016/2017 epidemic in The Netherlands. Objectives: We evaluated whether these alterations led to increased RSV incidence and disease burden. Study design: We sequenced the gene encoding the G-protein of prospectively collected clinical specimens from secondary care adult patients testing positive for RSV during the 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 epidemic RSV season. We evaluated associations between genetic, clinical and epidemiological data. Results: We included 49 RSV strains. In 2016/2017 28 strains were included, 20 community acquired RSV-A, 5 hospital acquired RSV-A and 3 community acquired RSV-B. In 2017/2018 21 strains were included, 8 community acquired RSV-A and 13 community acquired RSV-B. G-proteins of 10 out of the 20 community acquired 2016/2017 RSV-A strains shared a set of eight novel amino acid substitutions of which seven in mucin-like regions 1 and 2 and one in the heparin binding domain. This genetic variant was no longer detected among 2017/2018 RSV-A strains. Among patients carrying the novel RSV-A strain-type, 30% died. Conclusions: A set of eight amino acid substitutions was found in 50% of the 2016/2017 community acquired RSV-A G-proteins. This combination of substitutions was globally never observed before. The appearance of this new strain-type coincided with an increased RSV peak in The Netherlands and was associated with higher disease severity. The transient character of this epidemic strain-type suggests rapid clearance of this lineage in our study community.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据