4.4 Article

Eating Late Negatively Affects Sleep Pattern and Apnea Severity in Individuals With Sleep Apnea

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SLEEP MEDICINE
卷 15, 期 3, 页码 383-392

出版社

AMER ACAD SLEEP MEDICINE
DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.7658

关键词

eating duration; meal timing; nutrition; OSA; REM sleep; slow wave sleep

资金

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study Objectives: This study aimed to analyze the association between habitual meal timing and sleep parameters, as well as habitual meal timing and apnea severity in individuals with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Methods: Patients in whom mild to severe OSA was diagnosed were included in the study (n = 296). Sleep parameters were analyzed by polysomnography. Dietary pattern was obtained by a food frequency questionnaire and meal timing of the participants. Individuals with OSA were categorized by meal timing (early, late, and skippers). Results: Dinner timing was associated with sleep latency (beta = 0.130, P = .022), apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) (beta = 1.284, P = .033) and poor sleep quality (beta = 1.140, P = .015). Breakfast timing was associated with wake after sleep onset (WASO) (beta = 3.567, P = .003), stage N1 sleep (beta = 0.130, P < .001), and stage R sleep (beta = -1.189, P = .001). Lunch timing also was associated with stage N1 sleep (beta = 0.095, P = .025), sleep latency (beta = 0.293, P = .001), and daytime sleepiness (beta = 1.267, P = .009). Compared to early eaters, late eaters presented lower duration of stage R sleep and greater values of sleep latency, WASO, stage N1 sleep, and AHI, in addition to increased risk of poor sleep quality and daytime sleepiness (P < .005). Conclusions: Late meal timing was associated with worse sleep pattern and quality and apnea severity than early meal timing. Despite some of these results having limited clinical significance, they can lead to a better understanding about how meal timing affects OSA and sleep parameters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据