4.6 Article

Implementation of the new classification of periodontal diseases: Decision-making algorithms for clinical practice and education

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
卷 46, 期 4, 页码 398-405

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13104

关键词

case definition; diagnosis; gingivitis; periodontal diseases; periodontal health; periodontitis; periodontitis grading; periodontitis staging

资金

  1. European Research Group on Periodontology (ERGOPerio)
  2. University of Hong Kong Periodontal Research Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Implementation of the new classification of periodontal diseases requires careful navigation of the new case definitions and organization of the diagnostic process along rationale and easily applicable algorithms. The aim of this report was to describe the rationale for one such approach designed for clinical practice and education. Methods The authors developed empiric decision-making algorithms based on the new classification to effectively discriminate between the key periodontal diagnoses of periodontal health, gingivitis and periodontitis. Results A stepwise approach is proposed that includes (a) a sensitive screening step able to discriminate periodontal health, gingivitis and suspect periodontitis; (b) a specific confirmation step to provide differential diagnosis between periodontitis and the other conditions characterized by attachment loss; (c) a step to assess the severity and complexity of management of the periodontitis case (staging); and (d) a step to assess the risk profile of the case (grading). Specific decision-making algorithms are described for all steps of the diagnostic process. Conclusions The proposed process allows discrimination between the different case definitions of periodontal health and disease. The diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of the process need to be validated in prospective trials generalizable to operators with different level of expertise, different populations and clinical settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据