4.5 Article

Intra- and inter-laboratory agreement of the FAM19A4/mir124-2 methylation test: Results from an international study

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcla.22854

关键词

cervical cancer; cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; host-cell DNA methylation; HPV; QIAsure methylation test; reproducibility; triage

资金

  1. SME Instrument in the Horizon 2020 Work Programme of the European Commission [666800]
  2. Self-screen BV
  3. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [666800] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background HPV-based cervical screening detects women at an increased risk of cervical cancer and precancer. To differentiate among HPV-positive women those with (pre)cancer, triage testing is necessary. The detection of cancer-associated host-cell DNA methylation (FAM19A4 and hsa-mir124-2) in cervical samples has shown valuable as triage test. This multicenter study from 6 collaborating European laboratories and one reference laboratory was set out to determine the intra- and inter-laboratory agreement of FAM19A4/mir124-2 DNA methylation analysis utilizing the QIAsure Methylation Test. Methods Agreement analysis for the QIAsure Methylation Test was assessed on high-risk HPV-positive cervical specimens (n = 1680) both at the level of the assay and at the full workflow, including bisulfite conversion. Results Intra- and inter-laboratory assay agreement were 91.4% (534/584; 95% CI 88.9-93.5; kappa = 0.82) and 92.5% (369/399; 95% CI 90.0-94.7; kappa = 0.83), respectively. The inter-laboratory workflow (bisulfite conversion and assay combined) agreement was 90.0% (627/697; 95% CI 87.5%-92.0%; kappa = 0.76). Conclusion These data show that the QIAsure Methylation Test performs robust and reproducible in different laboratory contexts. These results support the use of the QIAsure Methylation Test for full molecular screening for cervical cancer, including primary HPV testing and triage testing by methylation analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据