4.7 Review

Risk Stratification in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: From Detection to Final Follow-Up

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
卷 104, 期 9, 页码 4087-4100

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2019-00177

关键词

-

资金

  1. US National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support Grant [P30 CA008748]
  2. Special Program of Research Excellence, SPORE in Thyroid Cancer [P50 CA172012-01A1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: Modern management of differentiated thyroid cancer requires individualized care plans that tailor the intensity of therapy and follow-up to the estimated risks of recurrence and disease-specific mortality. Design: This summary is based on the authors' knowledge and extensive clinical experience, supplemented by review of published review articles, thyroid cancer management guidelines, published staging systems, and original articles identified through a PubMed search, which included terms such as risk stratification, staging, clinical outcomes, and differentiated thyroid cancer. Main Outcome Measures: In the past, risk stratification in differentiated thyroid cancer usually referred to a static estimate of disease-specific mortality that was based on a small set of clinicopathological features available within a few weeks of completing initial therapy (thyroidectomy, with or without radioactive iodine). Today, risk stratification is a dynamic, active process used to predict the appropriateness for minimalistic initial therapy, disease-specific mortality, risk of recurrence, and the most likely response to initial therapy. Rather than being a static prediction available only after initial therapy, modern risk stratification is a dynamic, iterative process that begins as soon as a suspicious nodule is detected and continues through final follow-up. Conclusions: Dynamic risk assessment should be used to guide all aspects of thyroid cancer management, beginning before a definitive diagnosis is made and continuing through the final follow-up visit.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据