4.7 Article

Long-Term Efficacy of a Single Session of RFA for Benign Thyroid Nodules: A Longitudinal 5-Year Observational Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
卷 104, 期 9, 页码 3751-3756

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2018-02808

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of benign thyroid nodules has been gaining consensus. However, no solid information on its long-term efficacy is available. Objective: To analyze the long-term results of single-session RFA. Design: Retrospective longitudinal observational study. Setting: Primary care center. Patients or Other Participants: Adult outpatients who underwent a single-session RFA and post-treatment follow-up of least 3 years. Intervention: Ultrasound-guided RFA was performed after local anesthesia by moving-shot technique. RFA was performed with a median power of 55W and a median time of 14 minutes with an internally cooled 18-gauge electrode with an active 10-mm tip. Main Outcome Measures: Objective (trend of nodule volume) and subjective (compressive and cosmetic concerns) response to RFA were evaluated. Continuous variables were analyzed by the Wilcoxon and ANOVA test and their correlations by using the Spearman test. Categorical variables were compared by Pearson chi(2) test. Results: Two hundred and fifteen patients were included. An early significant reduction of nodule volume was found at 1 year, lasting up to 5 years. A 67% nodule shrinkage was observed at the end of the observation period. The best response was recorded in nodules below 10 mL (79% reduction early and 81% at 5 years). Patients' symptoms were significantly reduced. Conclusions: This study, by demonstrating a durable shrinkage of benign thyroid nodules treated by RFA with an improvement of subjective symptoms, establishes the reliability of RFA as alternative to surgery in the management of thyroid nodules, thus representing a remarkable novelty for clinical practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据