4.5 Article

Eave Screening and Push-Pull Tactics to Reduce House Entry by Vectors of Malaria

期刊

出版社

AMER SOC TROP MED & HYGIENE
DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0632

关键词

-

资金

  1. COmON Foundation through the Food for Thought campaign of the Wageningen University Fund, The Netherlands
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01 AI091595, T32 AI007532, P30 AI045008]
  3. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia, Portugal [SFRH/BDE/51601/2011]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BDE/51601/2011] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Long-lasting insecticidal nets and indoor residual spraying have contributed to a decline in malaria over the last decade, but progress is threatened by the development of physiological and behavioral resistance of mosquitoes against insecticides. Acknowledging the need for alternative vector control tools, we quantified the effects of eave screening in combination with a push-pull system based on the simultaneous use of a repellent (push) and attractant-baited traps (pull). Field experiments in western Kenya showed that eave screening, whether used in combination with an attractant -baited trap or not, was highly effective in reducing house entry by malaria mosquitoes. The magnitude of the effect varied for different mosquito species and between two experiments, but the reduction in house entry was always considerable (between 61% and 99%). The use of outdoor, attractant -baited traps alone did not have a significant impact on mosquito house entry but the high number of mosquitoes trapped outdoors indicates that attractant -baited traps could be used for removal trapping, which would enhance outdoor as well as indoor protection against mosquito bites. As eave screening was effective by itself, addition of a repellent was of limited value. Nevertheless, repellents may play a role in reducing outdoor malaria transmission in the peridomestic area.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据