4.7 Article

Risk of Incident Dementia According to Metabolic Health and Obesity Status in Late Life: A Population-Based Cohort Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
卷 104, 期 7, 页码 2942-2952

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2018-01491

关键词

-

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through a National Research Foundation of Korea grant - Ministry of Science and ICT [NRF-2016R1A5A1010764]
  2. Institute for Information & Communications Technology Promotion grant - Korean government [2017-0-01779]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: The risk for dementia among subjects who are obese with normal metabolic profiles, or called metabolically healthy obese (MHO), remains uninvestigated. Objective: To determine the association between late-life metabolic health and obesity status and risk of incident dementia. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: The National Health Insurance System, Republic of Korea. Patients: A total of 12,296,863 adults. 50 years old who underwent health examinations from 2009 to 2012 without baseline history of dementia. Main Outcome Measure: Incident overall dementia, Alzheimer's disease (AD), and vascular dementia (VaD). Results: Among subjects >= 60 years old, 363,932 (6.4%) developed dementia during a median follow-up of 65 months (interquartile range 51 to 74 months). The MHO group showed the lowest incidence of overall dementia [hazard ratio (HR) 0.85; 95% CI, 0.84 to 0.86] and AD (HR0.87; 95% CI, 0.86 to 0.88), but not VaD, compared with the metabolically healthy nonobese group. All components of metabolic syndrome except obesity significantly elevated the risk of dementia, and these associations were more pronounced in VaD. In particular, being underweight dramatically increased the risk of dementia. Conclusions: The MHO phenotype in late life demonstrated lower risk of overall dementia and AD but not VaD. Additional studies in other populations are warranted to elucidate current results and may predict individuals most at risk for developing dementia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据