4.7 Article

Circumglobal Response to Prescribed Soil Moisture over North America

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLIMATE
卷 32, 期 14, 页码 4525-4546

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0823.1

关键词

Rossby waves; Drought; Atmosphere-land interaction; Climate prediction; Diabatic heating; Soil moisture

资金

  1. Regional and Global Model Analysis (RGMA) component of the Earth and Environmental System Modeling Program of the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Biological and Environmental Research (BER) [DE-FC02-97ER62402]
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF)
  3. NSF
  4. Office of Science of the U.S. DOE [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  5. NOAA MAPP [NA14OAR4310224]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of idealized prescribed soil moisture experiments is performed with the atmosphere/land stand-alone configuration of the Community Earth System Model, version 1, in an effort to find sources of predictability for high-impact stationary wave anomalies observed in recent boreal summers. We arbitrarily prescribe soil water to have a zero value at selected domains in the continental United States and run 100-member ensembles to examine the monthly and seasonal mean response. Contrary to the lack of a substantial response in the boreal winter, the summertime circulation response is robust, consistent, and circumglobal. While the stationary wave response over the North America and North Atlantic sectors can be well explained by the reaction of a linear dynamical system to heating anomalies caused by the imposed dry land surface, nonlinear processes involving synoptic eddies play a crucial role in forming the remote response in Eurasia and the North Pacific Ocean. A number of other possible factors contributing to the circulation responses are also discussed. Overall, the experiments suggest that, in the boreal summer, soil moisture may contribute to the predictability of high-impact stationary wave events, which can impact regions that are great distances from these source regions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据