4.7 Article

Behavior and fate of As, Se, and Cd in an ultra-low emission coal-fired power plant

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 209, 期 -, 页码 722-730

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.270

关键词

Trace element; Removal; Air pollution control device (APCD); Ultra-low emission; Coal-fired power plant

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFB0605104]
  2. National Nature Science Foundation of China [41672148]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Environmental concerns regarding the toxicity of trace elements (TEs) and the harmful effects of these elements on humans have attracted worldwide attention. To meet stricter environmental policies, some coal-fired power plants have installed ultra-low emission equipment. In this paper, the behavior and fate of the trace elements As, Se, and Cd originating in an ultra-low emission coal-fired power plant equipped with air pollution control devices (APCDs), including selective catalytic reduction (SCR) equipment, a low-temperature economizer (LTE), an electrostatic precipitator (ESP), a wet flue gas desulfurization (WFGD) system, and a wet electrostatic precipitator (WESP), were investigated. Onsite samples of the feed coal, bottom ash, fly ash, gypsum, desulfurization slurry, WFGD effluent, WFGD-treated water, and WESP effluent were systematically collected and analyzed. The SCR and LTE configurations achieved a partial removal of As, Se, and Cd. The ESP trapped virtually all the particles and had a synergistic effect on the removal of the TEs. A systematic study of the recycling of the desulfurization slurry revealed TE enrichment in the WFGD system; because it concentrated in the liquid fraction of the gypsum slurry, Se was particularly susceptible to this enrichment. The effluent water treatment system achieved TE removal with efficiencies exceeding 94%. WESP operation achieved extensive removal of TE-enriched particles with percentages greater than 90%. The overall efficiencies of As, Se, and Cd removal obtained by the APCD system as a whole were 95.94%, 98.22%, and 92.70%, respectively. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据