4.7 Article

The role of trade unions in social-ecological transformation: Overcoming the impasse of the current growth model and the imperial mode of living

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 225, 期 -, 页码 173-180

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.284

关键词

Trade unions; (Un-)sustainable production and consumption patterns; Ecological modernization; Imperial mode of living; Social-ecological transformation; Solidaristic way of living

资金

  1. Austrian Climate and Energy Fund
  2. programme ACRP 6th Call

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In scholarly and political debates on transformation towards sustainability or along social-ecological lines, employees and trade unions are hardly ever mentioned. The latter still largely represent a perspective that could be summarized as jobs versus environment and formulate their environmental strategies within the confines of ecological modernization, if indeed at all-i.e. they do not question the orientation towards growth, capitalist power and production relations or a destructive societal nature relations. it was strong trade unions who won historical achievements for large parts of the population, but these achievements simultaneously deepened the problematic aspects of a mode of production and living which we call the imperial mode of living. This antinomy needs to be considered and dealt with politically. This paper examines the results of a multi-year empirical project on the views of Austrian trade unions on social-ecological transformation. It shows that, while there are already some important initiatives, these do not address the main challenge, i.e. the imperial mode of living. However, some entry points for a possible politicization of unsustainable production and consumption emerge from our research, along with a view of the role of trade unions in this politicization. One approach is to overcome the narrow equation of well-being with capitalist economic growth and to replace it with a more comprehensive understanding of well-being and quality of life. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据