4.7 Article

Hourly PM2.5 concentration forecast using stacked autoencoder model with emphasis on seasonality

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 224, 期 -, 页码 739-750

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.253

关键词

Stacked autoencoder; PM2.5; Meteorological data; Seasonality; Forecasting

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71801044]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFE0132200]
  3. Humanities and Social Science Foundation of Ministry of Education of China [17YJC630003]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing [cstc2018jcyjAX0436]
  5. Research Start-Up Funds of Chongqing Technology and Business University [1756012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accurate PM2.5 forecasting provides a possibility for establishing an early warning system to notify the public and take precautionary measures to prevent negative effects on ambient air quality and public health. Considering strong seasonal variation in meteorological conditions, in this paper, a seasonal stacked autoencoder model combining seasonal analysis and deep feature learning is proposed for forecasting the hourly PM2.5 concentration, named DL-SSAE model. The original data are firstly decomposed into four seasonal subseries according to the Chinese calendar, and then the Kendall correlation coefficient method is employed to search inherent relationships between PM2.5 concentrations and meteorological parameters within 1-h ahead for each seasonal time series. The inherent relationships of each seasonal subseries are finally extracted, learned, and modeled by different deep neural networks (stacked autoencoders for regression), and the hourly PM2.5 forecasts are yielded. The addressed model is tested by the dataset collected from three environmental monitoring stations in Beijing, China. The results demonstrate that the proposed model outperforms all other considered models with/without seasonality consideration in this paper. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据