4.7 Article

Model development of sustainability assessment from a life cycle perspective: A case study on waste management systems in China

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 210, 期 -, 页码 1005-1014

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.074

关键词

Sustainability; Environment-energy-economy-society model; Municipal solid waste; Treatment technology; Life cycle assessment; Multi-criteria decision making

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51676170]
  2. Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to University [B08026]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Due to the problems of municipal solid waste (MSW) during the expanding urbanization, strategy to find an environmentally friendly, energy efficient, cost-effective, and socially acceptable MSW management system is essential for sustainable development. This study establishes a novel environment-energy economy-society (3E + S) model from a life cycle perspective for sustainability assessment: life cycle assessment for evaluating environmental performance and energy consumption, life cycle costing for recording economic burden, and social life cycle assessment for reflecting social impacts; based on the individual 3E + S results, the final ranking of alternatives is obtained by multi-criteria decision making, which is integrated with analytic hierarchy process and entropy weight method. This model is implemented to identify a sustainable MSW management system among four typical treatment alternatives. Results show that incineration with fluidized bed furnace is the best choice in this study; incineration with moving grate furnace follows after with a slight gap; landfill with and without energy recovery rank the third and the last. The framework of SLCA on MSW field is built in this study and sensitivity analysis is provided for further discussion on social impacts. The calculation method of weight factors reduces man-made disturbances and the sensitivity analysis demonstrates strong robustness of the results and effectiveness of the modification for the model. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据