4.7 Article

Sustainable transportation management: Integrated modeling and support

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 212, 期 -, 页码 1381-1395

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.209

关键词

Sustainability; Transportation industry; Integrated management; Case study; New Zealand

资金

  1. fundamental research funds for the central universities of China [SKCX2018002]
  2. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
  3. 2018 Nanjing Social Science Funds General (Youth) Project in Spring [18CC05]
  4. program for the Philosophy and Social Sciences Research of Higher Learning Institutions of Shanxi (PSSR)
  5. Shanxi Soft Science [2016041023-2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The issue of sustainability has been a focus in the transportation industry. With the development of global business operations, increasing container demand causes transportation issues, and many trucking companies make truck assignment and driver scheduling decisions based on managerial experience, leading to capacity underutilization. A further consequence is traffic congestion and pollution issues influencing customer satisfaction. The key purpose of this study is to explore dynamic interactions among different dimensions of a sustainable transportation system, from the perspective of trucking companies. The design of this research is to firstly propose how the pillars of sustainability are interrelated, and then, to develop an integrated sustainable transportation management (STM) model, in terms of building a decision support system for trucking companies to make strategic decisions. The system is built for this research focusing on STM, and to realize the integration of sustainability into a decision support system. The practical implication of this study is to explore sustainability issues raised from the Ports of Auckland (POAL), a customer's warehouse and a process of container movement among trucking companies. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据