4.6 Article

Magnetic molecularly imprinted polymers doped with graphene oxide for the selective recognition and extraction of four flavonoids from Rhododendron species

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1598, 期 -, 页码 39-48

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2019.03.053

关键词

Farrerol; Magnetic extraction and purification; Graphene oxide; Surface molecular imprinting

资金

  1. Key Projects of the National Science and Technological Pillar Program [2015BAD1101]
  2. earmarked fund for the China Agriculture Research System [CAR-38]
  3. Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in Tibet Autonomous Region of China [XZNKY-2018-C-029]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31471654, 31772071, 31501571]
  5. China Agriculture Research System [CARS-05-05A-03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Herein, a novel magnetic molecularly imprinted polymer doped with reticular graphene oxide (Fe3O4@SiO2-GO@MIPs) was synthesized for the selective recognition and extraction of 4 flavonoids (farrerol, taxifolin, kaempferol, and hyperin) from Rhododendrons species. The Fe3O4@SiO2-GO@MIPs with lamellar membranes showed outstanding adsorption capacity. The 3D cavities complementary to the shape of farrerol were imprinted on the polymer framework after removal of farrerol template. Competitive binding assays showed that the polymer has a higher selectivity for farrerol compared with other analogues and references. The Fe3O4@SiO2-GO@MIPs as solid-phase extraction adsorbents combined with liquid chromatography-tandem quadrupole mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was used for selective determination of four flavonoids from Rhododendrons samples. The limits of detection (LOD) were 0.07, 0.08, 0.06, and 0.08 mu g L-1 for farrerol, taxifolin, kaempferol, and hyperin, respectively. These results suggest that the prepared Fe3O4@SiO2-GO@MIPs have the potential applicability to extract, purify, and enrich flavonoids from herbs, supplements, and other natural products. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据