4.7 Article

Numerical and Theoretical Aspects of the DMRG-TCC Method Exemplified by the Nitrogen Dimer

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 2206-2220

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00960

关键词

-

资金

  1. Research Council of Norway (RCN) under CoE [262695]
  2. Hungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Office (NKFIH) [K120569]
  3. Hungarian Quantum Technology National Excellence Program [2017-1.2.1-NKP-2017-00001]
  4. Czech Science Foundation [16-12052S, 18-18940Y, 18-24563S]
  5. Czech Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports [LTAUSA17033]
  6. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  7. ERC-STG-2014 [639508]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this article, we investigate the numerical and theoretical aspects of the coupled-cluster method tailored by matrix-product states. We investigate formal properties of the used method, such as energy size consistency and the equivalence of linked and unlinked formulation. The existing mathematical analysis is here elaborated in a quantum chemical framework. In particular, we highlight the use of what we have defined as a complete active space-external space gap describing the basis splitting between the complete active space and the external part generalizing the concept of a HOMO-LUMO gap. Furthermore, the behavior of the energy error for an optimal basis splitting, i.e., an active space choice minimizing the density matrix renormalization group-tailored coupled-cluster singles doubles error, is discussed. We show numerical investigations on the robustness with respect to the bond dimensions of the single orbital entropy and the mutual information, which are quantities that are used to choose a complete active space. Moreover, the dependence of the ground-state energy error on the complete active space has been analyzed numerically in order to find an optimal split between the complete active space and external space by minimizing the density matrix renormalization group-tailored coupled-cluster error.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据