4.7 Article

Hepatoprotective effect of Aloe vera against cartap- and malathion-induced toxicity in Wistar rats

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY
卷 234, 期 10, 页码 18329-18343

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.28466

关键词

antioxidants; malathion; oxidative stress; pesticide; phytochemicals; thiocarbamate

资金

  1. University Grants Commission
  2. Indian Council of Medical Research [SRF/02/2018/SBHSR]
  3. Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exposure to mixture of pesticides in agricultural practices pose a serious threat to the nontarget animals. In present work, we have evaluated the synergistic effect of cartap and malathion on rat liver followed by impact of Aloe vera leaves aqueous extract, which is not known. The animals in eight groups were used; each containing six rats: Group 1 acted as a control, Group 2-control with A. vera leaves aqueous extract, Group 3-with cartap, Group 4-with malathion, Group 5-with mixture of cartap and malathion, Group 6-cartap with the pretreatment of A. vera leaf extract, Group 7-malathion with the pretreatment of A. vera leaf extract, Group 8-mixture of cartap and malathion with the pretreatment of A. vera leaf extract. The animals treated for 15 days were killed after 24hr of last treatment. The biochemical studies in the rat liver demonstrated significant perturbations in the levels of nonenzymatic (glutathione and malondialdehyde) and enzymatic (superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione-S-transferase) antioxidative indices. The histopathological examination of liver revealed serious congestion in central vein and the disorganization of hepatic cords due to pesticide treatment. The administration of A. vera leaves aqueous extract was able to markedly protect rat liver from the pesticides-induced toxicity. The data indicated that pesticides were able to significantly induce oxidative stress which was substantially reduced by the application of plant extract.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据