4.5 Article

Nuclear RNA foci from C9ORF72 expansion mutation form paraspeckle-like bodies

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
卷 132, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.224303

关键词

Paraspeckles; C9ORF72; SFPQ; RNA foci; NEAT1

资金

  1. Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS (Slovenian Research Agency) [P4-0127, J3-9263, J3-8201, J3-6789, J3-5502, J7-5460, P1-0140]
  2. Alzheimer's Research UK
  3. National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre based at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
  4. King's College London
  5. King's College Hospital
  6. MRC [MC_PC_17115, UKDRI-6001, MC_G1000733, G0500289] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The GGGGCC (G(4)C(2)) repeat expansion mutation in the C9ORF72 gene is the most common genetic cause of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Transcription of the repeat and formation of nuclear RNA foci, which sequester specific RNA-binding proteins, is one of the possible pathological mechanisms. Here, we show that (G(4)C(2))(n) repeat RNA predominantly associates with essential paraspeckle proteins SFPQ, NONO, RBM14, FUS and hnRNPH and colocalizes with known paraspeckle-associated RNA hLinc-p21. As formation of paraspeckles in motor neurons has been associated with early phases of ALS, we investigated the extent of similarity between paraspeckles and (G(4)C(2))(n) RNA foci. Overexpression of (G(4)C(2))(72) RNA results in their increased number and colocalization with SFPQ-stained nuclear bodies. These paraspeckle-like (G(4)C(2))(72) RNA foci form independently of the known paraspeckle scaffold, the long non-coding RNA NEAT1. Moreover, the knockdown of SFPQ protein in C9ORF72 expansion mutation-positive fibroblasts significantly reduces the number of (G(4)C(2))(n) RNA foci. In conclusion, (G(4)C(2))(n) RNA foci have characteristics of paraspeckles, which suggests that both RNA foci and paraspeckles play roles in FTD and ALS, and implies approaches for regulation of their formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据