4.5 Article

Synthetic lethality of cytolytic HSV-1 in cancer cells with ATRX and PML deficiency

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
卷 132, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.222349

关键词

Sarcoma; Soft-tissue malignancies; Telomeres; Telomerase; Post-transcriptional control; Translational control; Oncolytic virus; ATRX; PML

资金

  1. Kids Cancer Alliance Scholarship
  2. Cure Cancer Australia Foundation [1062240]
  3. Cancer Council NSW Research Grant [RG 15-12]
  4. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1088646, 1053195]
  5. Cancer Institute NSWFellowship [11/FRL/5-02]
  6. Cancer Council NSW Program [PG11-08]
  7. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1088646] Funding Source: NHMRC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cancers that utilize the alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) mechanism for telomere maintenance are often difficult to treat and have a poor prognosis. They are also commonly deficient for expression of ATRX protein, a repressor of ALT activity, and a component of promyelocytic leukemia nuclear bodies (PML NBs) that are required for intrinsic immunity to various viruses. Here, we asked whether ATRX deficiency creates a vulnerability in ALT cancer cells that could be exploited for therapeutic purposes. We showed in a range of cell types that a mutant herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) lacking ICP0, a protein that degrades PML NB components including ATRX, was ten- to one thousand-fold more effective in infecting ATRX-deficient cells than wild-type ATRX-expressing cells. Infection of co-cultured primary and ATRX-deficient cancer cells revealed that mutant HSV-1 selectively killed ATRX-deficient cells. Sensitivity to mutant HSV-1 infection also correlated inversely with PML protein levels, and we showed that ATRX upregulates PML expression at both the transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels. These data provide a basis for predicting, based on ATRX or PML levels, which tumors will respond to a selective oncolytic herpesvirus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据