4.6 Article

Effect of an Early Switch to Belatacept Among Calcineurin Inhibitor-Intolerant Graft Recipients of Kidneys From Extended-Criteria Donors

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
卷 16, 期 7, 页码 2181-2186

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13698

关键词

clinical research; practice; kidney transplantation; nephrology; immunosuppression; immune modulation; immunosuppressant; fusion proteins and monoclonal antibodies: adhesion molecule specific; kidney (allograft) function; dysfunction; delayed graft function (DGF); donors and donation: extended criteria; drug toxicity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transplant recipients receiving a kidney from an extended-criteria donor (ECD) are exposed to calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity, as demonstrated by severe delayed graft function and/or a low GFR. Belatacept is a nonnephrotoxic drug that is indicated as an alternative to CNIs. We reported 25 cases of conversion from a CNI to belatacept due to CNI intolerance within the first 6 mo after transplantation. The mean age of the recipients was 59 years, and 24 of 25 patients received ECD kidneys. At the date of the medication switch, 12 of 25 patients displayed a calculated GFR (cGFR) <15 mL/min, six patients remained on dialysis, and the biopsies showed evidence of acute tubular damage associated with severe vascular or tubulointerstitial chronic lesions. Three patients did not recover renal function, and three patients died during the follow-up period. Among the remaining patients, renal function improved: The cGFR was 18.28 12.3 mL/min before the medication switch compared with 34.9 +/- 14.5 mL/min at 1 year after conversion to belatacept (p = 0.002). Tolerance of and compliance with belatacept were good, and only one patient experienced acute rejection. Belatacept is an effective therapy that preserves renal function in kidney transplant patients who are intolerant of CNIs. An early switch from calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) to belatacept improves renal function in CNI-intolerant graft recipients of kidneys from extended criteria donors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据