4.6 Article

Roles of the molecular weight of n-ethylene glycol diacrylates and UV irradiance on the mechanical properties at the gel point of acrylic acid based hydrogels

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 136, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.47606

关键词

crosslinking; gels; irradiation; rheology

资金

  1. Innovate UK agency under the Knowledge Transfer Partnership Programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated sol-gel transitions in acrylic acid based hydrogels with real time in situ photocrosslinking and Fourier transform mechanical spectroscopy. Crosslinkable n-ethylene glycol diacrylate (EGDA) compounds with molecular weights (MWs) in the range 171-575 g/mol were used in standard solutions of known polyacrylamide. The mutation number (N-mu) was monitored in all of the experiments, such that N-mu was 0.3 or lower at all of the experimental frequencies. During gelation, a frequency independence of tan delta was observed in all cases, such that the storage and loss moduli were scaled as about omega(n); this indicated the establishment of a sample spanning network in the hydrogels with the Winter-Chambon criteria. The relaxation exponents (ns) ranged from 0.35 to 0.81 when they were affected by both the MWs of the EGDAs and the UV irradiance. The stiffness of the critical gels steadily increased with increases in both the MWs of the EGDAs and the UV irradiance. The fractal dimensions decreased at the gel point with increasing MWs of the EGDAs, whereas it increased with an increase in the UV irradiance. An optimization tool (Design-Expert) was used to compare the effects and interactions of the reaction parameters on the gel-time characteristics of the critical gels and those of the fully formed hydrogels. A map (description) of the reaction parameters that can be used in the design of specific networks, particularly with values of n that are close to or equal to 0.5, is proposed. (c) 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019, 136, 47606.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据