4.6 Article

Fabrication and cell morphology of a microcellular poly(ether imide)-carbon nanotube composite foam with a three-dimensional shape

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 136, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.47501

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [5171001071]
  2. Program of the Innovative Research Team for Young Scientists of Sichuan Province [2016TD0010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The preparation of microcellular poly(ether imide) (PEI) based foams with three-dimensional geometry remains a great challenge worldwide. In this study, we fabricated microcellular PEI-carbon nanotube (CNT) bead foams with a batch rapid depressurization method in a self-designed mold with supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO(2)) as a blowing agent. The effects of the saturation time, foaming temperature, foaming pressure, and depressurization rate on the microcellular structures of the PEI foam were analyzed by the Taguchi approach to determine the optimum foaming conditions, and the influence of the CNT content on the cell structure was analyzed. The results show that the depressurization rate and foaming temperature were the key factors influencing the cell size and cell density (N-f); that is, the high depressurization rate and low foaming temperature favored a small cell size and high N-f. The foaming temperature also influenced the foaming ratio (phi), and a high phi was obtained at a high foaming temperature. Under optimal foaming conditions, PEI with 2.0 wt % CNTs presented the best cell structure; N-f, cell size, and phi were 6.14 x 10(10) cell/cm(3), 2.43 mu m, and 2.08, respectively. The mechanical properties of the final parts were related more to the foaming time and CNT concentration, and the maximum tensile and compression strength were reached at 3 h foaming time and 2.0 wt % CNT, that is, at 2.75 and 15.1 MPa (10% strain), respectively. (c) 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019, 136, 47501.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据