4.6 Article

Monthly variations of fucoidan content and its composition in the farmed brown alga Saccharina sculpera (Laminariales, Phaeophyceae)

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYCOLOGY
卷 31, 期 4, 页码 2623-2628

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10811-019-1753-x

关键词

Saccharina sculpera; Phaephyceae; Fucoidan content; Monthly variations; Polysaccharide; Sulfate; Monosaccharide composition

资金

  1. China Agriculture Research System [CARS-50]
  2. Special Funds for Key Laboratories Construction of Shandong Province [SDKL2017009]
  3. Developmental Program of Science and Technology of Yantai [2018LJRC067]
  4. Special Funds for Modern Agricultural Industry Technology System Construction of Shandong Province [SDAIT-26-11]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Crude fucoidan was extracted from the Saccharina sculpera from Rongcheng cultivation area in Sanggou Bay in the Yellow Sea of China which was sampled monthly from March to July. The crude fucoidan yield of S. sculpera showed an increase from 2.9% in March to 6.1% dry wt in July as the plant matured. And the content of polysaccharide (from 0.55 to 1.46% dry wt) and sulfate (from 0.37 to 1.62% dry wt) tended to increase from March to July as well. The monosaccharide composition changed constantly in the growing period with an increase of fucose (from 32.15 to 60.85 mol%) and a decrease of galactose (from 21.89 to 9.03 mol%). Analysis results showed that the content of crude fucoidan, polysaccharide, and sulfate in matured season was higher than that of other three species of farmed brown algae Saccharina japonica, Costaria costata, and Undaria pinnatifida in the same waters. These data indicated that S. sculpera was an excellent algal species in fucoidan content. This study on seasonal variations of polysaccharide, sulfate content, and monosaccharide composition provides a practical guidance for determining the optimal opportunity for harvesting the algae in order to standardize preparations of fucoidan for use in the pharmaceutical industry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据