期刊
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
卷 246, 期 -, 页码 189-194出版社
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.042
关键词
Adolescent; Mental health; Instrument; Screening tool; Validation; Indonesia
资金
- Australia-Indonesia Centre
Background: This study aimed to culturally verify and examine the empirical psychometric properties of the Indonesian versions of the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale - Revised (CESD-R), the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale - 10 items (K10) and a subset of 6 items of the K10, the K6 to detect depressive and anxiety disorders among older adolescents in Indonesia. Methods: The empirical psychometric properties were examined formally among students aged 16-18 years attending high schools in Jakarta. The scales were validated against the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children and Adolescents (MINI-Kid) modules for major depressive episode, dysthymia, panic disorder, separation anxiety disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. Results: In total, 196 students contributed complete data. All of the scales had Cronbach's alpha >0.8. The areas under the ROC Curve of CESD- R against MINI depressive disorders and K10/K6 against MINI depressive and anxiety disorders were at moderate to high accuracy levels (0.78 to 0.86). The optimal cut-off value of CESD- R (scores ranging: 0-60) to screen for any depressive disorder is >= 20 (sensitivity 75.0%; specificity 79.9%). The optimal cut-off value of K10 to detect any depressive/anxiety disorders is >= 18 (sensitivity 85.7%; specificity 74.7%); and K6 is >= 12 (sensitivity 81.0%; specificity 76.6%); Limitations: The school- based sample limits the generalisability of the findings to this group. Conclusions: This study suggests that the CESD- R I is a useful tool for screening for depressive disorders and both the K10 I and K6 I are useful for screening for any depressive or anxiety disorders among Indonesian adolescents.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据