4.6 Article

Temporal and Geographic Patterns of Social Media Posts About an Emerging Suicide Game

期刊

JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH
卷 65, 期 1, 页码 94-100

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.12.025

关键词

suicide; self-harm; mental health; social media; online

资金

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Rates of suicide are increasing rapidly among youth. Social media messages and online games promoting suicide are a concern for parents and clinicians. We examined the timing and location of social media posts about one alleged youth suicide game to better understand the degree to which social media data can provide earlier public health awareness. Methods: We conducted a search of all public social media posts and news articles on the Blue Whale Challenge (BWC), an alleged suicide game, from January 1, 2013, through June 30, 2017. Data were retrieved through multiple keyword search; sources included social media platforms Twitter, YouTube, Reddit, Tumblr, as well as blogs, forums, and news articles. Posts were classified into three categories: individual pro-BWC posts (support for game), individual anti-BWC posts (opposition to game), and media reports. Timing and location of posts were assessed. Results: Overall, 95,555 social media posts and articles about the BWC were collected. In total, over one-quarter (28.3%) were pro-BWC. The first U.S. news article related to the BWC was published approximately 4 months after the first English language U.S. social media post about the BWC and 9 months after the first U.S. social media post in any language. By the close of the study period, pro-BWC posts had spread to 127 countries. Conclusions: Novel online risks to mental health, such as prosuicide games or messages, can spread rapidly and globally. Better understanding social media and Web data may allow for detection of such threats earlier than is currently possible. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据