4.2 Article

Evaluation of deep convolutional neural networks for glaucoma detection

期刊

JAPANESE JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 63, 期 3, 页码 276-283

出版社

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s10384-019-00659-6

关键词

Artificial intelligence; Deep convolutional neural network; Deep learning; Ocular fundus color image; Glaucoma

资金

  1. Japan Agency of Medical Research and Development AMED

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose To investigate the performance of deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) for glaucoma discrimination using color fundus images Study design A retrospective study Patients and methods To investigate the discriminative ability of 3 DCNNs, we used a total of 3312 images consisting of 369 images from glaucoma-confirmed eyes, 256 images from glaucoma-suspected eyes diagnosed by a glaucoma expert, and 2687 images judged to be nonglaucomatous eyes by a glaucoma expert. We also investigated the effects of image size on the discriminative ability and heatmap analysis to determine which parts of the image contribute to the discrimination. Additionally, we used 465 poor-quality images to investigate the effect of poor image quality on the discriminative ability. Results Three DCNNs showed areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.9 or more. The AUC of the DCNN using glaucoma-confirmed eyes against nonglaucomatous eyes was higher than that using glaucoma-suspected eyes against nonglaucomatous eyes by approximately 0.1. The image size did not affect the discriminative ability. Heatmap analysis showed that the optic disc area was the most important area for the discrimination of glaucoma. The image quality affected the discriminative ability, and the inclusion of poor-quality images in the analysis reduced the AUC by 0.1 to 0.2. Conclusions DCNNs may be a useful tool for detecting glaucoma or glaucoma-suspected eyes by use of fundus color images. Proper preprocessing and collection of qualified images are essential to improving the discriminative ability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据