4.3 Article

Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome: An Emerging Drug-Induced Disease

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THERAPEUTICS
卷 23, 期 2, 页码 E601-E605

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000000034

关键词

cannabinoid hyperemesis; marijuana; cyclic nausea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cannabinoid hyperemesis is a relatively rare but significant adverse effect of chronic marijuana use characterized by severe, cyclic nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain and marked by compulsive hot-water bathing for temporary symptom relief. A 37-year-old African American male with no significant medical history other than the habitual abuse of marijuana was admitted for intractable nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain. With the exception of abdominal skin hyperpigmentation and scarring secondary to the direct application of heat through a heating pad, physical examination of the abdomen was unremarkable. Laboratory studies revealed a mild leukocytosis and acute renal dysfunction. All diagnostic examinations were found to be unremarkable or noncontributory to the patient's presenting state. Consistent with previous admissions, the patient's urine toxicology screening was found to be positive for marijuana. After several days of aggressive IV fluid hydration and as needed antiemetics and pain management, all laboratory studies and vital signs returned to baseline and the patient was subsequently discharged. Symptoms of cannabinoid hyperemesis resolve with cannabis cessation and recur when cannabis use is reinitiated, supporting an association between chronic use and cyclic vomiting. A Naranjo algorithm score of 5 revealed a probable incidence of cyclic vomiting associated with chronic cannabis abuse in our patient. Marijuana use, both legal and illegal, is becoming more prevalent in the United States. Given the nationwide increase in marijuana use for recreational and medical reasons, pharmacists and other health care providers should be aware of this interesting drug-induced phenomenon.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据