4.0 Article

Toxicity of Pexacerfont, a Corticotropin-Releasing Factor Type 1 Receptor Antagonist, in Rats and Dogs

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY
卷 38, 期 2, 页码 110-120

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1091581819827501

关键词

pexacerfont; corticotropin-releasing factor receptor antagonist; HPA axis; rat; dog

资金

  1. Bristol-Myers Squibb

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pexacerfont is a corticotropin-releasing factor subtype 1 receptor antagonist that was developed for the treatment of anxiety- and stress-related disorders. This report describes the results of repeat-dose oral toxicity studies in rats (3 and 6 months) and dogs (3 months and 1 year). Pexacerfont was well tolerated in all of these studies at exposures equal to or greater than areas under the curve in humans (clinical dose of 100 mg). Microscopic changes in the liver (hepatocellular hypertrophy), thyroid glands (hypertrophy/hyperplasia and adenomas of follicular cells), and pituitary (hypertrophy/hyperplasia and vacuolation of thyrotrophs) were only observed in rats and were considered adaptive changes in response to hepatic enzyme induction and subsequent alterations in serum thyroid hormone levels. Evidence for hepatic enzyme induction in dogs was limited to increased liver weights and reduced thyroxine (T-4) levels. Mammary gland hyperplasia and altered female estrous cycling were only observed in rats, whereas adverse testicular effects (consistent with minimal to moderate degeneration of the germinal epithelium) were only noted following chronic dosing in dogs. The testicular effects were reversible changes with exposure margins of 8x at the no observed adverse effect level. It is not clear whether the changes in mammary gland, estrous cycling, and testes represent secondary hormonal changes due to perturbation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis or are off-target effects. In conclusion, the results of chronic toxicity studies in rats and dogs show that pexacerfont has an acceptable safety profile to support further clinical testing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据