4.6 Review

Health effects of ultrafine particles: a systematic literature review update of epidemiological evidence

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
卷 64, 期 4, 页码 547-559

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.1007/s00038-019-01202-7

关键词

Ultrafine particles; Air pollution; Epidemiology; Health effects; Particulate matter

资金

  1. German Environmental Agency [00377 7205-2 UKAGEP]
  2. Swiss Federal Office for the Environment [110001982/8T20/13.0077.PJ/0003/M461-2794, 00.5082.PZ1-0389]
  3. Swiss Federal Ministry of Education and Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives Due to their small size, ultrafine particles (UFP) are believed to exert higher toxicity than larger particles. As numerous studies on health effects of UFP have been published since the last systematic review in 2013, we aim to systematically review the new literature. Methods We searched MEDLINE and the specialized LUDOK database for studies published between 01.01.2011 and 11.05.2017 investigating health effects of ambient air pollution-related UFP. We included epidemiologic studies containing UFP measures and quantifiable measures of associations. Relevant data were extracted on the basis of previously developed evaluation criteria. Results We identified 85 original studies, conducting short-term (n = 75) and long-term (n = 10) investigations. Panel (n = 32), scripted exposure with predefined settings (n = 16) or time series studies (n = 11) were most frequent. Thirty-four studies adjusted for at least one other pollutant. Most consistent associations were identified for short-term effects on pulmonary/systemic inflammation, heart rate variability and blood pressure. Conclusions The evidence suggests adverse short-term associations with inflammatory and cardiovascular changes, which may be at least partly independent of other pollutants. For the other studied health outcomes, the evidence on independent health effects of UFP remains inconclusive or insufficient.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据