4.7 Article

Smartphone-based Ellman's colourimetric methods for the analysis of D-penicillamine formulation and thiolated polymer

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
卷 558, 期 -, 页码 120-127

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.12.078

关键词

Smartphone; Colourimetric assay; Ellman; RGB; Penicillamine; Thiolated polymer

资金

  1. Thailand Research Fund (TRF) through the Royal Golden Jubilee Ph.D. Program Scholarship [PHD/0110/2559]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new, smartphone-based colourimetric method for the assay of D-penicillamine formulations relying on the Ellman's reaction was developed by performing the colourimetric reaction in a microplate. Subsequently, the plate was positioned on a white illuminating screen of an iPad placed in a dark box in order to capture a top-view image using an iPhone 5s back camera. The intensity of yellow colour was converted to Red-Green-Blue pixels using a free mobile application. Under the optimal conditions for the reaction and photography, the intensity of blue colour, which was logarithmically transformed, showed an excellent linearity over the drug concentration range of 5-40 mu g/mL. The assay was validated and successfully applied to the assay of drug content and the determination of drug amount released in the dissolution test in the capsule dosage forms. Apart from that, a smartphone was employed for the colour measurement as an alternative to a spectrophotometer in the currently used method for the quantitation of free sulfhydryl groups in polymers. Using cysteine-conjugated chitosan as a sample and L-cysteine as a standard, the smartphone method gave the results in agreement with those obtained from the absorbance measurement on a microplate reader. In conclusion, smartphone-based colourimetry has been proved to be a reliable, fast, simple and affordable alternative means for the analysis of D-penicillamine and cysteine-conjugated polymer and can be potentially applied to other thiol-containing drugs and excipients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据