4.7 Article

Experimental testing and numerical simulations of ship impact on axially loaded reinforced concrete piers

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPACT ENGINEERING
卷 125, 期 -, 页码 246-262

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.11.016

关键词

Ship-pier collision; Scaled model test; Nonlinear numerical simulation; Impact force

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51578285, 51778285]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20161545]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ship collision with bridge piers is one of the most frequent types of accidents that may lead to a bridge failure. The collision characteristic of bow structure is significant to the study ship-pier collision process. In this paper, the quasi-static compression test and numerical simulation of a simplified bow model were carried out to study the static stiffness characteristic of the ship bow for further comparison with the dynamic ones. To evaluate the performance of reinforced concrete (RC) piers against ship collision, and to guide the design of the bridge piers and anti-collision, scaled model tests of ship-pier collision and finite element simulations based on the main pier no. 217 of the Shijiu Lake Bridge were carried out. The damage process and failure mode of the pier were analysed. Instead of rigid or elastic materials in most of the previous works of numerical simulation of ship collision with bridge piers, the bridge pier is modelled with nonlinear materials to simulate the pier characteristics more accurately. To examine the reasonability of the scaled model tests, finite element analysis of the full-scale ship-pier collision was conducted. In the light of the numerical results, the design impact loads prescribed by Eurocode and AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications were evaluated. Parametric studies were carried out to investigate the effects of the dynamic parameters and impact velocity on the impact force and ship bow crush depth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据