4.7 Review

Review on the research of hydrogen storage system fast refueling in fuel cell vehicle

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 44, 期 21, 页码 10677-10693

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.02.208

关键词

Hydrogen storage; Fast filling; Temperature rise; CFD; Strategy

资金

  1. National Key Research And Development Program [2018YFB0105703, 2018YFB0105402]
  2. National Nature Science Foundation of China [51806024]
  3. Chongqing Research Program of Foundation and Advanced Technology [cstc2017jcyjAX0276]
  4. Research Projects of Chongqing University, China [106112017CDJPT280005, 106112016CDJXZ338825, 106112017CDJQJ338812]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A comprehensive review of the hydrogen storage systems and investigations performed in search for development of fast refueling technology for fuel cell vehicles are presented. Nowadays, hydrogen is considered as a good and promising energy carrier and can be stored in gaseous, liquid or solid state. Among the three ways, high pressure (such as 35 MPa or 70 MPa) appears to be the most suitable method for transportation due to its technical simplicity, high reliability, high energy efficiency and affordability. However, the refueling of high pressure hydrogen can cause a rapid increase of inner temperature of the storage cylinder, which may result not only in a decrease of the state of charge (SOC) but also in damages to the tank walls and finally to safety problems. In this paper, the theoretical analysis, experiments and simulations on the factors related to the fast refueling, such as initial pressure, initial temperature, filling rate and ambient temperature, are reviewed and analyzed. Understanding the potential relationships between these parameters and the temperature rise may shed a light in developing novel controlling strategies and innovative routes for hydrogen tank fast filling. (C) 2019 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据