4.7 Article

Improving fermentative hydrogen and methane production from an algal bloom through hydrothermal/steam acid pretreatment

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 44, 期 12, 页码 5812-5820

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.01.046

关键词

Dianchi lake algal bloom; Hydrogen; Methane; Hydrothermal pretreatment

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program-China [2016YFE0117900]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Key Research and Development Program-China [2017C04001]
  3. European Union [797259]
  4. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) through the Centre for Marine and Renewable Energy (MaREI) [12/RC/2302]
  5. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [797259] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Algal blooms can be harvested as renewable biomass waste for gaseous biofuel production. However, the rigid cell structure of raw algae may hinder efficient microbial conversion for production of biohydrogen and biomethane. To improve the energy conversion efficiency, biomass from an algal bloom in Dianchi Lake was subjected to a hydrothermal/steam acid pretreatment prior to sequential dark hydrogen fermentation and anaerobic digestion. Results from X-ray diffraction and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy suggest that hydrothermal acid pretreatment leads to stronger damage of the amorphous structure (including hemicellulose and amorphous cellulose) due to the acid pretreatment, as evidenced by the higher crystallinity index. Scanning electron microscopy analysis showed that smaller fragments (similar to 5 mm) and wider cell gaps (similar to 1 mu m) on algal cell surfaces occurred after pretreatment. In comparison to steam acid pretreatment, hydrothermal acid pretreatment resulted in a maximum energy conversion efficiency of 44.1% as well as production of 24.96 mL H-2/g total volatile solids (TVS) and 299.88 mL CH4/g TVS. (C) 2019 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据