4.3 Article

Pore structure and permeability of filter cake in coal slurry filtration

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/19392699.2019.1585830

关键词

Coal slurry filtration; pore structure; permeability; fractal dimension; critical thickness

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51604280]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the pore structure and permeability of filter cakes in coal slurry filtration process, showing that as filtration time increases, the filter cakes exhibit smaller pores, lower porosity, narrower pore size distribution, and higher fractal dimension. The relationship between filter cake permeability and thickness follows a first-order exponential decay law, with a proposed critical thickness determined by the maximum curvature point of the permeability-thickness curve, providing theoretical support for achieving efficient coal slurry filtration.
The dewatering performance is dependent on the understanding of the pore structure and permeability of the filter cake in coal slurry filtration. In this paper, filter cakes were prepared from three different coal samples under the filtration pressure of 0.6 MPa with different filtration times, and the pore distribution and pore complexity of filter cakes were investigated using image processing technology and fractal theory, and the calculation of permeability of filter cakes were carried out on the basis of Darcy's law. With an increase in filtration time, the filter cake is characterized by smaller pore diameter and porosity, narrower pore diameter distribution, and greater fractal dimension. The relationship between the permeability of filter cake and its thickness in filtration process obeys first-order exponential decay, and it could be expressed by K(L-c) = C-0 + C-1 exp(-L-c/C-2). The critical thickness of filter cake is proposed and calculated using the maximum curvature point of K(L-c) curve, which provides theoretical support for achieving high-efficiency filtration of coal slurry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据