4.7 Article

In vitro digestion under simulated saliva, gastric and small intestinal conditions and fermentation by human gut microbiota of polysaccharides from the fruits of Lycium barbarum

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.081

关键词

Lycium barbarum; Polysaccharides; Digestion; Fermentation; Gut microbiota

资金

  1. Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Industry Integration Project of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region [YES-16-0506]
  2. Pilot Project by Ningxia Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Science [NKYZ-16-05, JLC01]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present study, the digestion under simulated saliva, gastric and small intestinal conditions and in vitro fermentation by human gut microbiota of Lycium barbarum polysaccharides (LBPS) were investigated. As a result, LBPS contained carbohydrates, uronic acids, protein and polyphenols of 60.96 +/- 5.58, 20.98 +/- 2.49, 5.30 +/- 0.12 and 1.04 +/- 0.06%, respectively. Furthermore, LBPS was mainly consisted of glucuronic acid (5.12 mol%), galacturonic acid (12.40 mol%), glucose (2.15 mol%), galactose (39.67 mol%) and arabinose (40.66 mol%). Under simulated saliva, gastric and small intestinal conditions, LBPS was not affected. Whereas, LBPS could be utilized by gut microbiota based on the consumption of monosaccharides, decreased molecular weight and lower content of total carbohydrates after fermentation in vitro. With the proceeding of fermentation, LBPS significantly promoted the production of short-chain fatty acids. Meanwhile, LBPS could alter the microbial community after 24 h fermentation, especially enhancing the relative abundances of genera Bacteroides, Bifidobacterium, Phascolarctobacterium, Clostridium XlVb, Prevotella and Collinsella. All the results suggested that LBPS could be developed as special ingredients for modulating gut microbiota composition and promoting the growth of beneficial bacteria like Bifidobacterium. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据