4.7 Article

Effect of removing coloring metal ions from the natural brick-red palygorskite on properties of alginate/palygorskite nanocomposite film

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.10.218

关键词

Palygorskite; Alginate; Nanocomposite film; Variable metal ions; Mechanical strength

资金

  1. Key Research & Development Project of Gansu Provincial Sci. & Tech, Department China [17YF1WA167]
  2. Major Projects of the Natural Science Foundation of Gansu, China [18JR4RA001]
  3. Funds for Creative Research Groups of Gansu, China [17JR5RA306]
  4. Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS [2016370]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Natural palygorskite (Pal) nanorods have huge application prospect as a reinforcing filler of polymer material, but the presence of variable coloring metal ions (i.e., Fe(III)) in natural Pal may affect the comprehensive properties of polymer materials. In order to reveal the effects of removing coloring metal ions on the structure and mechanical, transparency and anti-aging performance of the polymer, a series of sodium alginate/Pal (SA/Pal) nanocomposite films were prepared using natural brick-red Pal (RPal) and white acid-leached Pal (HPaI) as fillers, and their properties were investigated comparatively. Results indicate removal of partial metal ions in Pal greatly improved the mechanical, transmittance, water-resistance and anti-aging properties of SA/HPal film in contrast to the SA/RPal film, due to the intensified interaction between HPal and SA After exposure in UV condition for 72 h, the SA/RPal film becomes brittle with a great decrease of tensile strength from 11.05 to 6.71 MPa; but the SA/HPal film still keeps good flexibility with only a slight decrease of tensile strength from 14.66 to 12.09 MPa, indicating a passive effect of removing Fe(III) on improving anti-aging performance of SA/Pal film. This research paves a theoretical foundation to extend the application of naturally abundant Pal in polymer materials. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据