4.5 Article

Novel N-heterocyclic carbene silver(I) complexes: Synthesis, structural characterization, and anticancer activity

期刊

INORGANICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 486, 期 -, 页码 711-718

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.ica.2018.11.044

关键词

N-heterocyclic carbene; Silver complex; Benzimidazole-2-ylidene; Anticancer activity

资金

  1. Scientific and Technological Research of Turkey (TUBITAK-BIDEB)
  2. National Research Fellow-ship Programme
  3. National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  4. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering NIBIB [EB0160100]
  5. Department of Defense Prostate Cancer Research Program Idea Development Award [PC150431 GRANT11996600]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we synthesized four novel unsymmetrically substituted NHC ligands (la-d) and their Ag(I) complexes (2a-d). All new compounds were characterized using elemental analysis, FT-IR, H-1 NMR, and C-13 NMR spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography. The molecular structure of complex 2d was elucidated through single crystal X-ray diffraction analyses. Single crystal structural studies for complex 2d show that the benzene rings (C9-C14) and the central benzimidazole ring system make dihedral angles of 85.65(11)degrees. The Ag-Cl and Ag-C single bond lengths are 2.3553(7) and 2.096(2)angstrom, respectively. The C-Ag-C/ bond angle is 168.27(7)degrees. Both salts and complexes were tested for their anti-cancer potential against three human cancer cell lines (DU-145, MCF-7, and MDA-MB-231) and non-cancer cells adipose from mouse (L-929) for 24 h, 48 h and 72 h using the MTT assays. However, the Ag(I)-NHC complexes (2a-d) showed a dose and time-dependent cytotoxic activity against all cell lines. MDA-MB-231 human breast carcinoma cells were the most sensitive to the Ag(I)-NHC complex displaying IC50 lower than 1 mu M all time points. Further, the IC(50)s for Ag(I)-NHC were higher in non-cancer cells, suggesting that complexes possessed noteworthy selectivity for human cancer cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据