4.4 Article

Impact of influenza on hospitalization rates in children with a range of chronic lung diseases

期刊

INFLUENZA AND OTHER RESPIRATORY VIRUSES
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 233-239

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/irv.12633

关键词

chronic lung diseases; influenza burden; pediatrics

资金

  1. Rotary Club of Sydney Cove

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Data on burden of severe influenza in children with a range of chronic lung diseases (CLDs) remain limited. Method We performed a cohort study to estimate burden of influenza-associated hospitalization in children with CLDs using population-based linked data. The cohort comprised all children in New South Wales, Australia, born between 2001 and 2010 and was divided into five groups, children with: (a) severe asthma; (b) bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD); (c) cystic fibrosis (CF); (d) other congenital/chronic lung conditions; and (e) children without CLDs. Incidence rates and rate ratios for influenza-associated hospitalization were calculated for 2001-2011. Average cost/episode of hospitalization was estimated using public hospital cost weights. Results Our cohort comprised 888 157 children; 11 058 (1.2%) had one of the CLDs. The adjusted incidence/1000 child-years of influenza-associated hospitalization in children with CLDs was 3.9 (95% CI: 2.6-5.2) and 0.7 (95% CI: 0.5-0.9) for children without. The rate ratio was 5.4 in children with CLDs compared to children without. The adjusted incidence/1000 child-years (95% CI) in children with severe asthma was 1.1 (0.6-1.6), with BPD was 6.0 (3.7-8.3), with CF was 7.4 (2.6-12.1), and with other congenital/chronic lung conditions was 6.9 (4.9-8.9). The cost/episode (95% CI) of influenza-associated hospitalization was AUD 19 704 (95% CI: 11 715-27 693) for children with CLDs compared to 4557 (95% CI: 4129-4984) for children without. Discussion This large population-based study suggests a significant healthcare burden associated with influenza in children with a range of CLDs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据