4.6 Article

Economic Process Selection of Liquefied Natural Gas Regasification: Power Generation and Energy Storage Applications

期刊

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
卷 58, 期 12, 页码 4946-4956

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b00179

关键词

-

资金

  1. Technology Innovation Program - Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE, Korea) [10067793]
  2. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT, Korea)
  3. BK 21 Program - Korean Ministry of Education (MOE)
  4. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [10067793] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Liquefied natural gas (LNG) demand has been rapidly increasing due to the global need for clean energy resources. This study analyzes and compares LNG regasification processes and technologies from the technoeconomic perspective and focuses on utilizing LNG cold energy as an economically beneficial option. The comparative technoeconomic analyses focus on the following three process: (1) a simple LNG regasification process, which wastes LNG cold energy; (2) an LNG regasification power plant (LPP) process, which utilizes LNG cold energy to generate electricity; (3) an LNG regasification power plant integrated with a cryogenic energy storage (LPCES) process, which utilizes LNG cold energy to store electricity. The results indicate that the LPP process has the highest net present value of $215 million for 1 MTPA LNG regasification, whereas the simple LNG regasification process and the LPCES process are valued at $210 million and $188 million, respectively. Sensitivity analysis results show that the relative rank of profitability of these three technologies varies according to discount rates, electricity prices, and carbon tax. This study not only revealed that LNG cold energy use can be an economically beneficial option but also helped determine the most profitable LNG regasification process under varying regional and market conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据