4.4 Article

Modulation type classification of interference signals in automotive radar systems

期刊

IET RADAR SONAR AND NAVIGATION
卷 13, 期 6, 页码 944-952

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1049/iet-rsn.2018.5521

关键词

-

资金

  1. Technology Innovation Program (or Industrial Strategic Technology Development Program) - Ministry of Trade, industry & Energy (MOTIE, Korea) [10080086]
  2. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [10080086] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As the importance of radar sensors for automotive vehicles has rapidly increased, the mutual interference between vehicle radars has become important. If two or more radars share the same transmitting frequency band, their interference effects are retained after low-pass filtering. These interference signals can degrade the performance of target estimation, as they increase the noise floor level and create ghost targets, consequently causing false alarms. Several studies on mitigating interference effects have been conducted. However, they only focused on suppression techniques. For a complete interference mitigation algorithm, the identification of the existence of interference signals and classification of their modulation techniques should precede the mitigation steps. Therefore, the authors propose a method for the identification and the classification of interference signals. They modelled five different radar modulation signals as interference signals, and extracted five features from the time-domain mixer output signals. The training of the classification model and validation of its classification performance is done using the support vector machine. The simulation results show that the existence of interference signals is identified with the accuracy of over 99%. Furthermore, the interference signals are effectively classified into their modulation types with an accuracy of over 96%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据