4.5 Article

RECQL5: Another DNA helicase potentially involved in hereditary breast cancer susceptibility

期刊

HUMAN MUTATION
卷 40, 期 5, 页码 566-577

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/humu.23732

关键词

breast cancer; germline pathogenic variant; RECQL5; whole exome sequencing

资金

  1. National Centre for Genomic Analysis [300]
  2. Boehringer Ingelheim
  3. Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation
  4. Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [SAF2014-57680-R]
  5. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  6. Pfizer
  7. Sao Paulo Research Foundation-FAPESP
  8. Health Ministry [PI12/00070]
  9. Genome Canada
  10. Novartis Pharma AG
  11. FIS [15/00059]
  12. AbbVie
  13. Eshelman Institute for Innovation, University of North Carolina
  14. La Caixa Foundation
  15. Innovative Medicines Initiative [(EU/EFPIA) [ULTRA-DD 115766]]
  16. H2020
  17. BRIDGES project [634935]
  18. Takeda
  19. Janssen
  20. Merk Co
  21. Bayer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is still around 50% of the familial breast cancer (BC) cases with an undefined genetic cause, here we have used next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology to identify new BC susceptibility genes. This approach has led to the identification of RECQL5, a member of RECQL-helicases family, as a new BC susceptibility candidate, which deserves further study. We have used a combination of whole exome sequencing in a family negative for mutations in BRCA1/2 throughout (BRCAX), in which we found a probably deleterious variant in RECQL5, and targeted NGS of the complete coding regions and exon-intron boundaries of the candidate gene in 699 BC Spanish BRCAX families and 665 controls. Functional characterization and in silico inference of pathogenicity were performed to evaluate the deleterious effect of detected variants. We found at least seven deleterious or likely deleterious variants among the cases and only one in controls. These results prompt us to propose RECQL5 as a gene that would be worth to analyze in larger studies to explore its possible implication in BC susceptibility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据