4.5 Article

The Alpha-1-Antitrypsin Promoter Improves the Efficacy of an AAV Vector for the Treatment of MNGIE

期刊

HUMAN GENE THERAPY
卷 30, 期 8, 页码 985-998

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/hum.2018.217

关键词

MNGIE; AAV; TYMP; thymidine; promoter; mitochondria

资金

  1. Spanish Instituto de Salud Carlos III [PI15/00465]
  2. E.R.D.F.
  3. Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca
  4. Generalitat de Catalunya (PERIS program) [SLT002/16/00370]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MNGIE (mitochondrial neurogastrointestinal encephalomyopathy) is a devastating disease caused by mutations in TYMP, which encodes thymidine phosphorylase (TP). In MNGIE patients, TP dysfunction results in systemic thymidine and deoxyuridine overload, which interferes with mitochondrial DNA replication. Preclinical studies have shown that gene therapy using a lentiviral vector targeted to hematopoietic stem cells or an adeno-associated vector (AAV) transcriptionally targeted to liver are feasible approaches to treat MNGIE. Here, we studied the effect of various promoters (thyroxine-binding globulin [TBG], phosphoglycerate kinase [PGK], hybrid liver-specific promoter [HLP], and alpha-1-antitrypsin [AAT]) and DNA configuration (single stranded or self complementary) on expression of the TYMP transgene in the AAV8 serotype in a murine model of MNGIE. All vectors restored liver TP activity and normalized nucleoside homeostasis in mice. However, the liver-specific promoters TBG, HLP, and AAT were more effective than the constitutive PGK promoter, and the self-complementary DNA configuration did not provide any therapeutic advantage over the single-stranded configuration. Among all constructs, only AAV-AAT was effective in all mice treated at the lowest dose (5 x 10(10) vector genomes/kg). As use of the AAT promoter will likely minimize the dose needed to achieve clinical efficacy as compared to the other promoters tested, we propose using the AAT promoter in the vector eventually designed for clinical use.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据