4.7 Article

Children show hemispheric differences in the basic auditory response properties

期刊

HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING
卷 40, 期 9, 页码 2699-2710

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24553

关键词

cortical maturation; development; electromagnetic brain imaging; N100m; N250m

资金

  1. Academy of Finland (National Centres of Excellence Programme) [29160, 292552, 315553, 274086]
  2. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  3. Finnish Cultural Foundation
  4. Academy of Finland (AKA) [274086, 292552, 292552, 274086] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Auditory cortex in each hemisphere shows preference to sounds from the opposite hemifield in the auditory space. Besides this contralateral dominance, the auditory cortex shows functional and structural lateralization, presumably influencing the features of subsequent auditory processing. Children have been shown to differ from adults in the hemispheric balance of activation in higher-order auditory based tasks. We studied, first, whether the contralateral dominance can be detected in 7- to 8-year-old children and, second, whether the response properties of auditory cortex in children differ between hemispheres. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) responses to simple tones revealed adult-like contralateral preference that was, however, extended in time in children. Moreover, we found stronger emphasis towards mature response properties in the right than left hemisphere, pointing to faster maturation of the right-hemisphere auditory cortex. The activation strength of the child-typical prolonged response was significantly decreased with age, within the narrow age-range of the studied child population. Our results demonstrate that although the spatial sensitivity to the opposite hemifield has emerged by 7 years of age, the population-level neurophysiological response shows salient immature features, manifested particularly in the left hemisphere. The observed functional differences between hemispheres may influence higher-level processing stages, for example, in language function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据