4.5 Article

Hepatic gene expression in mouse models of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease after acute exercise

期刊

HEPATOLOGY RESEARCH
卷 49, 期 6, 页码 637-652

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/hepr.13323

关键词

exercise; gene expression; NAFLD

资金

  1. Swiss League Against Cancer [KFS 3506]
  2. Swiss Foundation Against Liver Cancer
  3. University Federico II of Naples
  4. Compagnia di San Paolo, as part of Program STAR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients benefit from physical exercise. This study aimed to investigate the effect of acute exercise on hepatic gene expression in different mouse models of NAFLD. Methods C57BL/6J mice were fed with a control (CD) or a high fat (HFD) diet. AlbCrePten(flox/flox) (Pten-KO) and Fxr(-/-) mice, two genetic models of NAFLD with insulin hypersensitivity and resistance, respectively, were fed with CD. After 4 weeks, mice were randomly assigned to exercise or sedentariness. Mice were killed 15 min or 3 h after the running/sedentary period. Genome-wide hepatic gene expression was evaluated with the Illumina Micro-array platform. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction confirmed changes in gene expression. Results Acute exercise transiently affected the expression of genes involved in the immune response in C57BL/6 mice fed with CD and this effect normalized in the recovery phase. Acute exercise affected genes involved in gluconeogenesis in the insulin resistant Fxr(-/-) model. Genes involved in lipid metabolism were affected in C57BL/6 mice fed with CD, but not in mouse models of NAFLD. Genes involved in DNA damage response pathways were deregulated only in C57BL/6 mice fed with CD and not in mouse models of NAFLD. Conclusion The simultaneous analysis of different NAFLD models revealed that an acute exercise bout affects hepatic gene expression differentially according to animal models and that most of the differentially expressed genes are involved in glucose and fatty acid metabolism, immune regulation, and DNA damage response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据