4.7 Article

Upper-Airway Collapsibility and Loop Gain Predict the Response to Oral Appliance Therapy in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea

期刊

出版社

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201601-0099OC

关键词

upper-airway anatomy; obstructive sleep apnea; ventilation

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [5R01HL102321-02]
  2. Harvard Catalyst Clinical Research Center [UL1 RR 025758-01]
  3. Monash Lung and Sleep Department
  4. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia's CJ Martin Overseas Biomedical Fellowship [1035115]
  5. NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence
  6. NeuroSleep
  7. NHMRC Early Career Fellowship
  8. R. G. Menzies award [1053201]
  9. American Heart Association [11POST7360012, 15SDG25890059]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rationale: Oral appliances (OAs) are commonly used as an alternative treatment to continuous positive airway pressure for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, OAs have variable success at reducing the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), and predicting responders is challenging. Understanding this variability may lie with the recognition that OSA is a multifactorial disorder and that OAs may affect more than just upper-airway anatomy/collapsibility. Objectives: The objectives of this study were to determine how OA alters AHI and four phenotypic traits (upper-airway anatomy/collapsibility and muscle function, loop gain, and arousal threshold), and baseline predictors of which patients gain the greatest benefit from therapy. Methods: In a randomized crossover study, 14 patients with OSA attended two sleep studies with and without their OA. Under each condition, AHI and the phenotypic traits were assessed. Multiple linear regression was used to determine independent predictors of the reduction in AHI. Measurements and Main Results: OA therapy reduced the AHI (30 +/- 5 vs. 11 +/- 2 events/h; P < 0.05), which was driven by improvements in upper-airway anatomy/collapsibility under passive (1.9 +/- 0.7 vs. 4.7 +/- 0.6 L/min; P < 0.005) and active conditions (2.4 +/- 0.9 vs. 6.2 +/- 0.4 L/min; P < 0.001). No changes were seen in muscle function, loop gain, or the arousal threshold. Using multivariate analysis, baseline passive upper-airway collapsibility and loop gain were independent predictors of the reduction in AHI (r(2) = 0.70; P = 0.001). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that OA therapy improves the upper-airway collapsibility under passive and active conditions. Importantly, a greater response to therapy occurred in those patients with a mild anatomic compromise and a lower loop gain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据