4.3 Article

Newborn screening for haemophilia: The views of families and adults living with haemophilia in the UK

期刊

HAEMOPHILIA
卷 25, 期 2, 页码 276-282

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/hae.13706

关键词

attitudes; bloodspot; ethics; genetics; haemophilia; newborn screening; social implications

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [203384/Z/16/Z]
  2. Wellcome Trust [203384/Z/16/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction As genomic sequencing become more efficient and cost-effective, the number of conditions identified through newborn screening globally is set to dramatically increase. Haemophilia is a candidate condition; however, very little is known about the attitudes of the haemophilia community towards screening. Aim This study aimed to outline the perspectives of adults with haemophilia and their families towards newborn screening. Methods A paper and online survey on screening were distributed to every family known to the Haemophilia Society UK. Data collection occurred between January and June 2018. In total, 327 participants completed the survey: 76% were a relative of a person with haemophilia and 24% had haemophilia themselves; 83% were living with haemophilia A and 17% with haemophilia B. Results The vast majority supported newborn screening (77%) and preferred it to other forms of screening (preconception or prenatal). Participants supported newborn screening primarily because they viewed it as a means to facilitate early support and treatment, facilitate informed decisions about future pregnancies and prevent the diagnostic odyssey. The 23% who did not support the screen did not associate these particular benefits with newborn screening. Conclusion Haemophilia emerged from this analysis as a condition that the vast majority of participants considered a liveable disability and one best suited to newborn screening programmes that could improve support to affected families rather than reduce the birth rate of affected children.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据