4.7 Article

Estimation of soil temperature from meteorological data using different machine learning models

期刊

GEODERMA
卷 338, 期 -, 页码 67-77

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.11.044

关键词

Soil temperature; Machine learning models; Soil depth; Extreme learning machine

资金

  1. Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment [2017ZX0 7101003]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51679243, 31661143011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soil temperature (T-s) plays a key role in physical, biological and chemical processes in terrestrial ecosystems. Accurate estimation of T-s at various soil depths is crucial for land-atmosphere interactions. This study investigated the applicability of four different machine learning models, extreme learning machine (ELM), generalized regression neural networks (GRNN), backpropagation neural networks (BPNN) and random forests (RF), for modeling half-hourly T-s at four different depths of 2 cm, 5 cm, 10 cm, and 20 cm on the Loess Plateau of China. A field experiment was conducted to measure half-hourly T-s and meteorological variables. Air temperature, wind speed, relative humidity, solar radiation, and vapor pressure deficit were used as inputs to train the models for estimation of half-hourly T-s. The results showed ELM, GRNN, BPNN and RF models provided desirable performance in modeling half-hourly T-s at all depths, with root mean square error values ranging 2.26-2.95, 2.36-3.10, 2.32-3.04 and 2.31-3.00 degrees C, mean absolute error values ranging 1.76-2.26, 1.83-2.31, 1.80-2.32 and 1.79-2.26 degrees C, Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient values ranging 0.856-0.930, 0.841-0.924, 0.847-0.927 and 0.850-0.927, and concordance correlation coefficient values ranging 0.925-0.965, 0.925-0.963, 0.928-0.963, and 0.924-0.961 for the ELM, GRNN, BPNN, and RF models, respectively. There was a statistically significant agreement (P < 0.001) between the measured and modeled values at both half-hour and daily timescales, and the box plots showed the distributional differences between the measured and modeled values were small. Generally, the ELM model had slightly better performance with much better computation speed than GRNN, BPNN as well as RF models at half-hourly timescales, thus the ELM model was highly recommended to estimate T-s at different soil depths.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据