4.6 Article

Impact of NUDT15 genetics on severe thiopurine-related hematotoxicity in patients with European ancestry

期刊

GENETICS IN MEDICINE
卷 21, 期 9, 页码 2145-2150

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41436-019-0448-7

关键词

NUDT15; TPMT; pharmacogenetics; adverse drug reaction; hematotoxicity

资金

  1. Robert Bosch Stiftung Stuttgart [U-PGx 668353]
  2. ICEPHA Graduate School Tubingen-Stuttgart

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Severe hematotoxicity in patients with thiopurine therapy has been associated with genetic polymorphisms in the thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT). While TPMT genetic testing is clinically implemented for dose individualization, alterations in the nudix hydrolase 15 (NUDT15) emerged as independent determinant of thiopurine-related hematotoxicity. Because data for European patients are limited, we investigated the relevance of NUDT15 in Europeans. Methods: Additionally to TPMT phenotyping/genotyping, we performed in-depth Sanger sequencing analyses of NUDT15 coding region in 107 European patients who developed severe thiopurine-related hematotoxicity as extreme phenotype. Moreover, genotyping for NUDT15 variants in 689 acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients was performed. Results: As expected TPMT was the main cause of severe hematotoxicity in 31% of patients, who were either TPMT deficient (10%) or heterozygous carriers of TPMT variants (21%). By comparison, NUDT15 genetic polymorphism was identified in 14 (13%) patients including one novel variant (p.Metllle). Six percent of patients with severe toxicity carried variants in both TPMT and NUDT15. Among patients who developed toxicity within 3 months of treatment, 13% were found to be carriers of NUDT15 variants. Conclusion: Taken together, NUDT15 and TPMT genetics explain similar to 50% of severe thiopurine-related hematotoxicity, providing a compelling rationale for additional preemptive testing of NUDT15 genetics not only in Asians, but also in Europeans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据