4.5 Article

Effects of age-related changes in step length and step width on the required coefficient of friction during straight walking

期刊

GAIT & POSTURE
卷 69, 期 -, 页码 195-201

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.02.005

关键词

slips and falls; aging; required coefficient of friction; ground reaction forces

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [16K06038]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K06038] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Slipping is one of the leading causes of falls among older adults. Older adults are considered to walk with a small anteroposterior (AP) component and a large mediolateral (ML) component of the required coefficient of friction (RCOF) owing to a short step length and a wide step width, respectively. However, limited information is available. Research question: What are the effects of aging on the resultant RCOF (RCOFres) and its ML (RCOFML) and AP (RCOFAP) components during straight walking? Methods: We used the kinetic and kinematic data of 188 participants aged 20-77 years from a publicly available database (National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology Gait Database 2015). The participants were divided into the following three groups: young group (n = 56; age range, 20-34 years), middle-aged group (n = 50; age range, 35-64 years), and old group (n = 82; age range, 65-77 years). Results: The RCOFres and RCOFAP were lower in the old group than in the other groups, indicating a lower slip risk in this group. However, the RCOFML was higher and the step width was greater in the old group than in the other groups. The higher RCOFML and lower RCOFAP in the old group might be associated with slips in a more lateral direction. Significance: Our findings suggest that older adults have a high risk of slipping in a more lateral direction. Shoes with high-slip resistance in the lateral direction are recommended to prevent hazardous lateral slips among older adults.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据