4.5 Article

Surface damage evolution during transient thermal shock of W-2%vol Y2O3 composite material in different surfaces

期刊

FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN
卷 139, 期 -, 页码 86-95

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2019.01.010

关键词

W-2%vol Y2O3 composite material; Plasma facing materials; Transient thermal shock

资金

  1. National Magnetic Confinement Fusion Program [2014GB121001]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51574101, 51474083]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [PA2018GDQT0010]
  4. Foundation of Laboratory of Nonferrous Metal Material and Processing Engineering of Anhui Province [15CZS08031]
  5. 111 Project [B18018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

W-2%vol Y2O3 composite material were prepared by wet chemical and rolling methods. The thermal shock damage behaviors of rolling direction-transverse direction (RD-TD) and transverse direction-transverse direction (TD-ND) surfaces under one-pulse and 100-pulse thermal shock in different power densities were studied at room temperature. Results showed that the TD-ND surface was more resistant to transient thermal shock than the RD-TD surface. The RD-TD surface more likely to occur plastic deformation than the TD-ND surface, attributed to the gamma-fiber of RD-TD surface has a larger Schmid factor than a-fiber of TD-ND surface and is more prone to slip. The cracks generated and propagated more easily along the direction of grain elongation. With the increase in power density, transverse and longitudinal primary crack width, as well as surface roughness, first increased and then decreased. Under the transient thermal shock power density of 0.66 GW/m(2), the surface morphology of the material mainly manifested as primary and secondary cracks, without obvious plastic deformation. Moreover, the addition of Y2O3 particles is beneficial to resist crack propagation, but some Y2O3 particles exhibited a flake phenomenon due to multiple thermal shocks under high power density.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据